Legal Opinion
Abbott v. Bragdon
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 25, 1995No. Civ. 94-073-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND HER COMPLAINT
BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sidney Abbott moves to amend her complaint in her action against Defendant Dr. Randon Bragdon alleging discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Maine Human Rights Act (“MHRA”). Until now, Abbott’s complaint has included a claim for civil penal damages asserted pursuant to 5 M.R.S.A. § 4613(2)(B)(7). She now moves to amend her Complaint in order to withdraw that claim. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs Motion to Amend is denied.
According to Abbott, Dr. Randon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Jimmie R. Rachal, Cross-Appellant v. Ingram Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Moser v. Texas Trailer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Diotima Shipping Corp. v. Chase, Leavitt & Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- El-Hajj v. Fortis Benefits Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2001
- ROCQUE v. ZETTY LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021