Legal Opinion

Palma v. Racz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 1939PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The defendant, while driving an automobile, negligently struck the plaintiff, breaking his right femur. The plaintiff was then about eleven years old. At the trial medical evidence in behalf of the plaintiff tended to prove that his right femur had been so injured that it would not grow thereafter, and that the continued normal growth of the left femur would result in serious and permanent deformities. Medical evidence in behalf of the defendant tended to prove that a slight difference in length which then existed would become no worse. The judge found for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,200.

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Dillon v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Jones v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Murnane v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Hartmann v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Kinnear v. General Mills, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Weiner v. Pictorial Paper Package Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Downey v. Union Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API