Legal Opinion

Murnane v. MacDonald

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1936PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

These two actions of tort, which were tried together, arose out of a collision between an automobile owned and operated by the plaintiff Murnane and an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The action by the plaintiff Murnane was brought to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by him and for damage to his automobile. The other action was brought by *373the plaintiff Harney to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by her while a passenger in the automobile owned and operated by the plaintiff Murnane. In each case there was a verdict for the plaintiff in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Cerrato v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Moskow v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Wright v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Nussenbaum v. Chambers & Chambers Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Bresnahan v. PromanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Palma v. RaczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API