Legal Opinion
Matter of Steig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 2016No. D-64-16PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995. He was previously admitted to practice in New Jersey in 1992, where he formerly maintained an office for the practice of law. *
By order filed July 9, 2015, respondent was disbarred upon his consent by the Supreme Court of New Jersey (Matter of Steig, 222 NJ 20, 117 A3d 173 [2015]), upon allegations that he had knowingly misappropriated client funds. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) now moves for an order imposing discipline in this state pursuant to the Rules for Attorney…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re HalbfishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of MorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of RadshawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of DasentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of ColbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Matter of EzealaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Matter of FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020