Legal Opinion
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 24, 2009PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner moves to suspend respondent attorneys on the ground that they have failed to file a registration statement and pay the required attorney registration fee in accordance with Judiciary Law § 468-a and part 118 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR part 118).
The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. They have also failed to respond to the instant motion.
Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by153 opinions
- Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Timourian)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of MuellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of MuellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of EscanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Matter of LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.