State v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Edwards District Court. Prosecution' for a violation of § 7 of the prohibitory liquor law of 1881. The defendant Schmidt was tried June 5,1885, found guilty as charged, sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and costs, and to be committed to the jail of Edwards county until the judgment should be complied with. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was a criminal prosecution upon indictment, wherein the defendant was charged with selling intoxicating liquors in violation of the prohibitory liquor law of 1881. (Laws of 1881, ch. 128.) The defendant was found guilty, and sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and costs, anil from this sentence he now appeals to this court.
Several questions are presented for consideration, which we shall consider in their order:
I. It is claimed that the court below erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to quash the indictment, for the reason that §…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. CrimminsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- State v. NyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
- Bank of America, N.A. v. NarulaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933
- Olsson v. Lawrence TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.