Legal Opinion

Pollock v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1912No. 17,690PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 1.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The voluminous record in this case presents one question: Were the demurrers to the amended petition rightfully overruled? The suit was brought by a taxpayer of Kansas City, Kan., to enjoin the city from entering into a contract for the paving of certain streets, who amended his petition so as to *206cover the pavement on one street only. The controlling questions involved in the ruling are, whether the plaintiff can maintain the suit under section 265 of the code, and if so, whether the proviso of section 1009 of the General Statutes of 1909,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Education v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Cole v. DorrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Jackson v. PauleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Bunker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Meistrell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tomasic v. Kansas City, Kansas Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. John Ritchie & Sons v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Stevenson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Beeler & Campbell Supply Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Braun, Bryant & Austin v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API