Messinger v. Lee
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Fine, J.,
Rose Messinger, appellant, instituted suit in assumpsit to recover a portion of deposit money paid under a written agreement of sale of real estate and now complains of judgment entered for Mary Oliver Lee, appellee. By agreement of counsel the case was withdrawn from the jury and thereafter pertinent provisions of the pleadings were offered in evidence. The court made findings of fact, conclusions of law and entered judgment for appellee. Appellant’s exceptions were overruled, a final judgment entered and this appeal followed. .......
Appellant agreed to purchase premises,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sanders v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Riling v. IdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Roberts v. RoeschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Dluge v. WhitesonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Steinbach v. PettingillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tudesco Et Ux. v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Kaufman Hotel & Restaurant Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Luria v. ROBBINSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Brunetto v. FerraraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Terminal Realty Corp. v. Doubler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.