Dluge v. Whiteson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
Defendant desired to retire from business, and for this reason agreed with plaintiffs to sell to them the merchandise in his store, for seventy-five per cent of its inventoried value. The agreement did not specify what should be the rights and liabilities of the parties in the event of a default. Plaintiffs paid $3,000 on account, but later refused to complete the contract. Defendant then purchased additional goods, hired expert salesmen, advertised extensively, and finally sold the merchandise at retail for a sum which gave him, after deducting the expenses…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sanders v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Riling v. IdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Martin v. SchoenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vines v. Orchard Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Tudesco Et Ux. v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Yentis v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- In Re Oscar Nebel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Kaufman Hotel & Restaurant Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.