Legal Opinion

Village of Dolton v. Harms

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 6, 1945No. Gen. No. 43,308PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

Plaintiff states that “this is an action in equity for a recovery by the plaintiff against the defendant treasurer and the sureties on his official bonds in the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars, and for an accounting to determine the amount of recovery to be allowed on the said bonds.” Defendant Garrett Jacobsma and defendant John S. Van Deursen, who appear in the title of the case as appellees, were not served with process and neither entered his appearance. Defendant John Harms, Sr., died December 20, 1944.

After plaintiff had filed its amended complaint, defendants John Harms, Sr.,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Rothschild v. Village of Calumet ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Clarke v. Boorman's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Norris v. HagginSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. City of Chicago v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1880

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Manson v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. A. Marlo Miller v. Jack Stinnett and Clifford SherveeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  4. Spitzer v. Bradshaw-Praeger & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  5. Hamrick v. Indianapolis Humane Society, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API