Legal Opinion

Horbal v. Moxham National Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1995No. 1029PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

We are asked to determine whether the Deficiency Judgment Act, originally the Act of July 16,1941, P.L. 400,12 P.S. § 2621.1 et seq., reenacted as the Act of July 9, 1976, P.L. 586, No. 142, § 2, now 42 Pa.C.S. § 8103 et seq., bars the redemption of a certificate of deposit (CD) by an assignee bank, where the assignment secured an antecedent indebtedness also secured by a mortgage upon real estate. We conclude that the Act has no application to the facts presented on this appeal. Moreover, we find that all conditions of the assignment were met and redemption of the CD was in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State University v. County of CentreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Gwendolyn v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Crystian (In Re Crystian)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Evelyn Temple Addington v. Milton TempleMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API