Legal Opinion
Jacquelyne L. Neal v. William H. Brown, III
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 11, 1992No. 91-5089PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Stripped to its essentials, this case presents the question whether a federal district court’s denial of a motion to remand is subject to interlocutory review. We hold that it is not and accordingly dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Although the disposition of this appeal is straightforward, its path to this court was not. Appellant Jacquelyne Neal, a citizen of Tennessee, initially brought this action in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on October 5, 1990. She named as defendants the law firm of Sehnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, a…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- George K. Brough v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and Third Party v. Carpenter & Paterson, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Biw Deceived v. Local S6, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, Iamaw District Lodge 4Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- In Re: Dale Chimenti, Lizabeth Chimenti, Joey Chimenti, and Stefanie ChimentiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Walter E. Campbell Co., Inc. v. Hartford Financial Services Group, IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Colon v. AshbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Strategic Lien Acquisitions LLC v. Republic of ZaireDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.