Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bassett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 10, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Miller

Affirming.

George Bassett and Howell Bassett were indicted for the offense of carrying on business under the assumed name, designation and style, of the “Bassett Hardwood Manufacturing Company,” without having first filed in the county court clerk’s office a certificate setting forth the name under which said business was to be conducted or transacted, and the true or real full name or names of the person or persons owning, conducting or transacting the same, with their postoffice addresses, as is required by the Act of 1906, now section 199b of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burnside v. Lincoln County CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  2. Board Trustees Erlanger Graded Common School District v. TateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Mark v. BloomCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Commonwealth v. RicheyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. South v. FishCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. District Board of Tuberculosis Sanatorium Trustees v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Warren Oil & Gas Co. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Stone v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API