In Re: Parental Rights as to I.G.C.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
P.3d 1259, 1262 (2012) (quoting McClanahan u. Raley's, Inc., 117 Nev. 921, 924,
34 P.3d 573, 576
(2001)). Termination of parental rights "A party petitioning to terminate parental rights must establish by clear and convincing evidence that (1) termination is in the child's best interest, and (2) parental fault exists." In re Parental Rights as to A.J.G., 122 Nev. 1418, 1423,
148 P.3d 759, 762
(2006); NRS 128.105. Because "terminating parental rights is an exercise of awesome power that is tantamount to imposition of a civil death penalty," the district court's determination of whether it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Rico v. RodriguezNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Interest of Natasha H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Diana L. N. v. State, Department of Human Resources, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Tammila G. v. State, Department of Human ResourcesNevada Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.