Watkins v. Lord
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, for Ada County.' Hon, Carl A. Davis, Judge. Aetion for damages for criminal conversation. “Plaintiff may be required to file a bill of particulars, giving particular place, time and dates of - each act of criminal conversation of which she intends to give evidence, where her declaration specifies particular acts without thus identifying them.” (Virtue v. Beackam, 17 N. Y. .Supp. 450; 5 Cur.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, for Ada County.' Hon, Carl A. Davis, Judge. Aetion for damages for criminal conversation. “Plaintiff may be required to file a bill of particulars, giving particular place, time and dates of - each act of criminal conversation of which she intends to give evidence, where her declaration specifies particular acts without thus identifying them.” (Virtue v. Beackam, 17 N. Y. .Supp. 450; 5 Cur. Law, 278; Howells v. North American Transp. & Trad. Co., 24 Wash. 689, 64 Pac. 786; Wanner v. Pauly, 141 HI. 442, 30 N. E. 1025; Tillow v.…
1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.
This is an action of criminal conversation for debauching respondent’s wife. Judgment for damages was awarded in the sum of $2,500. From which judgment *355and from an order denying a motion for a, new trial, this appeal was prosecuted.
Appellant’s brief contains twenty-four separate assignments of error but it will not be necessary to discuss all of them.
The third assignment: “3. That the court erred in refusing to compel the plaintiff to furnish the defendant a specific bill of particulars of the dates, places and times when the defendant carnally knew the plaintiff’s wife, if at all,” — is not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tilton v. . BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Bassett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- French v. DeaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- People v. MullingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Knickerbocker v. WorthingMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Neal v. NealIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Ayres v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Credit Bureau of San Diego, Inc. v. SmallenAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.