Legal Opinion
Haley v. Pataki
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided May 3, 1995No. 6:95-mj-00550PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, DECISION & ORDER
McAYOY, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are legislative employees of the State of New York (“State”). They have been employed to provide services either for the duration of éach legislative session or on an annual basis. Each of these legislative employees is generally paid a bi-weekly salary pursuant to New York State Finance Law § ’200. Plaintiffs have not been paid for work performed for the State since March 31, 1995 notwithstanding the fact that payment for work performed through April 5, 1995 was due on April 19, 1995.
■ Each plaintiff has supplied reasons…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haley v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Haley v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- American Federation of Government Employees v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Donohue v. PatersonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.