Legal Opinion
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 2001No. 99CV92PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SEAY, District Judge.
Before the court for its consideration is the plaintiffs Cherokee Nation and the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes’ motion for partial summary judgment of liability on the first and second causes of action and the plaintiffs’ motion for declaratory judgment on the third cause of action. Also at issue is the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment.
I Facts
The court finds the facts as follows. The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, 25 U.S.C. § 450 et. seq. (hereinafter the “ISDA”) was designed to promote tribal autonomy and self-governance. In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. LeavittSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Menominee Indian Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Arctic Slope Native Association, Ltd. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Seneca Nation of Indians v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.