Legal Opinion
Landmark Properties v. Olivo
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 6, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Final judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
In this holdover summary proceeding, landlord and tenants originally proceeded upon a stipulation of agreed facts, including that tenants had harbored, and continued to harbor, a dog; that this was in violation of the lease; that tenants had had the dog for approximately six years; and that “[t]he only issues involved herein are whether as a matter of law the harboring of a dog as prohibited by the lease agreement is a violation of a substantial obligation of the tenancy so as to entitle the petitioner to recover…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dice v. Inwood Hills CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Crossroads Apartments Associates v. LeBooRochester City Court · 1991
- One Overlook Avenue Corp. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Ocean Gate Associates Starrett Systems, Inc. v. DopicoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981
- Paulsen Real Estate Corp. v. GrammickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sinisgallo v. Town of Islip Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Lucas v. Riverside Park Condominiums Unit Owners Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Landmark Properties v. OlivoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
- Guenther v. Walnut Grove Hillside Condo. Regime No. 3Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021