Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gowan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1990No. 1853 and 1852PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

The appellants, Ronnie M. McRae and Daniel W. Gowen, appeal pro se to this Court from judgments of sentence entered on July 5, 1988 following their convictions of disorderly conduct in violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 5503(a)(2).

§ 5503. Disorderly conduct(a) Offense defined.—A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he:(2) makes unreasonable noise;

On November 2, 1987, the appellants, preachers of the Anabaptists’ faith, were preaching and distributing religious literature to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Commonwealth v. MastrangeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. GreeneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. RothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. International Society for Krishna Consciousness of Western Pennsylvania, Inc. v. GriffinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Startzell v. City of Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. MaerzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. GilbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Com. v. McConnell, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API