Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 18, 1941No. 13574PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Réid, Chief Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

If the conveyance from Perkins to Mrs. Rhodes of February 21, 1930, is one under which the grantee would get the benefit of after-acquired independent title by the grantor, we may skip over and not be concerned with the legal effect of the transactions and conveyances by which Realty Trust & Savings Company acquired and subsequently conveyed title to Perkins. Under the stipulation, Realty Savings & Trust Company finally had good title, conveyed it to him, he reconveyed to Realty Savings & Trust Company to secure a debt, and this…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Clark v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Terry v. RodahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Citizens Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Cowart v. SingletarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy W. Williams and Carl v. IveyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Columbian Carbon Co. v. KightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  3. Federal Land Bank v. Bank of LenoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Hanlon v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Warlick v. Rome Loan & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API