Legal Opinion

Harris v. Home Savings Ass'n

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided June 19, 1989No. 88-0504-CV-W-1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WHIPPLE, District Judge.

Pending before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, herein filed on March 17, 1989. Plaintiff filed a short response to defendant’s motion on April 7, 1989 and on May 17, 1989, defendant filed a reply thereto.

Plaintiff’s complaint contains claims of harassment and discrimination on the basis of race and sex under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985. Defendant seeks summary judgment on all of plaintiff’s claims and in the alternative, seeks partial summary judgment…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Comstock v. Consumers Markets, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1996
  3. Davis v. Kansas City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API