Legal Opinion

Benham, Ziegler & Co. v. Mouledoux

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1932No. 14185PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

This matter comes before us on motion to dismiss the appeal.

In support of the motion appellees argue that the judgment appealed from is interlocutory and not final; that no irreparable injury has been caused by it, and that it necessarily follows that no appeal may be taken therefrom.

If it appears that the judgment is interlocutory, and that no irreparable injury may be caused thereby, then no appeal will lie, because, although, under article 566 of the Code of Practice, it is provided that an appeal may be taken from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John Barkley & Co. v. Ham & SeymourSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Wolff v. McKinneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
  3. Ansley v. StuartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Board of Liquidating Com'rs of Bank v. DodsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  5. Succession of PonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benham, Ziegler & Co. v. ImouledouxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API