Legal Opinion

Eurengy v. Equitable Realty Corp.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 30, 1937PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action originally instituted for the recovery of $47,967.50 as rents under a lease and for $42,778.16 for taxes assessed against the demised premises for which, under the lease, defendant was obligated but had failed to pay and for the appointment of a receiver to collect the income from premises. The bill was later amended asking’ that the lease on such premises be canceled and that possession be delivered to the owners. The decree of the chancellor below was for plaintiffs and the named defendant has appealed. The motion to dismiss this appeal filed here by the receiver as amicus…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Garnhart v. FinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  3. Lindeke v. Associates Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. Metropolitan Land Co. v. ManningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Wilson v. HaginsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Casper v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Lucas Hunt Village Co. v. KleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Fredeking v. GrimmettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Page Two, Inc. v. P.C. Management, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Wilson v. WattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API