Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 7, 1999No. C930434CR; CA A95197PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a post-judgment order denying his motion to seal court records pertaining to indigent defense expenses. After defendant was convicted of murder, the Washington County District Attorney apparently obtained certain court records relating to defense expenses incurred in State v. Bradly Morris Cunningham, C930434CR, as well as other related documents from the State Indigent Defense Services office. The district attorney used those records in unsuccessfully pursuing criminal charges against an attorney and an expert witness who provided indigent defense services in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. CurranOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. K. P.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Abbott v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. SpainhowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Simpson v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API