Legal Opinion
People v. Rancka
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 28, 1993No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1124Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new counsel without making further inquiry regarding the reasons for the request (see, People v Sides, 75 NY2d 822, 824; People v Sawyer, 57 NY2d 12, 18-19, rearg dismissed 57 NY2d 776, cert denied 459 US 1178; People v Slaughter, 162 AD2d 640, 641, lv granted 76 NY2d 944, revd on other grounds 78 NY2d 485).
Furthermore, the record reflects that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered his pleas of guilty (see, People v Nixon, 21 NY2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. SidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. SlaughterNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. BurroughsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. RanckaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993