Malanga v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff alleged causes of action for false arrest, malicious prosecution, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress after she was questioned by a store manager concerning her alleged involvement in a theft ring. She was charged with petit larceny and received an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (ACD);
Special Term properly granted summary judgment to the defendant and dismissed the cause of action for malicious prosecution. Since an ACD…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hollender v. Trump Village Cooperative, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Jacques v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Rawson v. Francis H. LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Toenis v. HommelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Malanga v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Newsom v. Thalhimer Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Arrington v. Liz Claiborne, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Pawlicki v. City of IthacaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.