McLeran v. Benton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Rhodes, J.:
This is an action of ejectment to recover the possession of lands in San Francisco, lying within the lines of the Van Hess Ordinance. It is found, among other facts, that prior to September 13th, 1849, Jacob Harmon and Eleonora, his wife, were in the actual possession, use, and occupation of a tract of land known as the Harmon tract; and that they so took and held possession thereof after coverture, and resided thereon with their family. Harmon and wife were divorced *471by a decree of the Court of First Instance which was rendered October, 1849, and affirmed in 1850 by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Brooks v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Stephens v. MansfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Ewald v. CorbettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by10 opinions
- Middle Creek Ditch Co. v. HenryMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- McLeran v. BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Bollinger v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Watts v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Wambole v. FooteSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.