Silverman v. Bullock
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard, in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. W.. W. .Harwell, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
The facts in this case, susceptible of direct proof, are so well established as to admit of no disagreement. The subject of controversy is that with which the law charges the parties interested with notice..
Prior to November, 1872, complainant, with defendant Runyan, and Harlow P. Smith, were the owners of a tract of land adjoining the city of Chicago. Subsequently the owners platted it into lots and blocks, designating it as “Central Park Second Addition to Chicago.” A division of the lots between the owners was made, and it is as to a portion of the lots set apart to complainant Bullock,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hildreth v. SandsNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
3Cited by19 opinions
- Miller v. LarnedIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Himrod v. GilmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Schultz v. SroelowitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Humble v. CurtisIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Millikin Trust Co. v. GregoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.