Legal Opinion
Case-Hoyt Corp. v. Graphic Communications International Union Local 503
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 13, 1997No. 96-CV-6284LPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Case-Hoyt Corporation (“Case-Hoyt” or “Company”), commenced this action, pursuant to § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, against defendant, Graphic Communications International Union Local 503 (“Union”), to vacate an arbitration award. In a decision, filed March 18, 1997, I confirmed the arbitration award, and judgment was entered accordingly. Pending before the Court now is the Union’s motion to amend the judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e).
BACKGROUND
In the fall of 1993, Case-Hoyt laid off several employees as part of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robert J. McCarthy v. John Manson, Commissioner of Corrections of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred PickholzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- International Chemical Workers Union (Afl-Cio), Local No. 227, Plaintiff- Cross-Appellant v. Basf Wyandotte Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United Steelworkers of America, District 36, Local 8249 v. Adbill Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- C.H. Sanders Co. v. BHAP Housing Development Fund Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Case-Hoyt Corp. v. Graphic Communications International Union Local 503District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Riverbay Corporation v. Service Employees International Union, Local 32BJDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023