Legal Opinion

Dalrymple v. Taneyhill

High Court of Chancery of Maryland

Decided March 15, 1853PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The facts upon which the questions presented by the exceptions to the Auditor’s report in this case arise, are few and simple, and may be briefly stated.

On the 28d of October, 1850, Virgil B. Dalrymple, in his •own right, and Agnes E. Dalrymple, his daughter, then an infant, by the said Virgil, as her guardian and next friend, exhibited their bill in this court, praying for the sale of the real estate of Zachariah Taneyhill, lately deceased, intestate, upon the allegation that the same was incapable of partition, and that it would be for the interest and advantage of all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rogers v. KrebsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1823
  2. Leadenham's, Ex'r v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1827
  3. Hammond v. StierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1829

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simard v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. McCann v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Mizen v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Werner v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  5. Godfrey v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API