Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Tyson
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided May 12, 1997No. 05-96-01214-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRIS, Justice.
This is an original proceeding. Ford Motor Company seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to vacate its order imposing sanctions for discovery abuse pursuant to rule 215(3) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The pretrial sanctions imposed on Ford include the exclusion of arguably favorable evidence, payment of attorney’s fees, and payment of $10,000,000 to the real parties in interest within ten days of the sanction order. Because we conclude Ford has an adequate remedy on appeal to challenge the exclusion of evidence and award of attorney’s fees, we…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- Christus Health Gulf Coast v. CarswellTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Davis v. Rupe, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- Christus Health Gulf Coast (As an Entity, D/B/A Christus St. Catherine Hospital, and Formerly D/B/A Christus St. Joseph Hospital) v. Linda G. Carswell, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.