Legal Opinion

Earley R. Woodmore v. Git-N-Go

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1986No. 84-2224PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Earley R. Woodmore, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action against defendant, Git-N-GO, Inc., for failure to submit a pretrial memorandum.

Plaintiff brought a race discrimination suit against Git-N-Go in the Eastern District of Oklahoma in 1984, which also contained a pendent state claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Both parties were represented by counsel, who received a form letter from the court clerk, instructing them to meet with each other and submit a pretrial memorandum to the court. The memorandum is required by Rule 17 of the Rules of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In the Matter of the Sanction of Jay C. Baker and Michael J. Carson, George Roland Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc. v. Ed Dietlin, D/B/A Dietlin Aircraft, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. D G Shelter Products Company, a California Corporation v. Forest Products Company, a New Mexico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Gus O. Hollis, Maxine Hollis, and Jean Walsh Quinnett v. The United States of America, Independent Petroleum Association of America, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Stanley v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Evelyn Hancock v. City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. M.E.N. Co. v. Control Fluidics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API