Legal Opinion

Coker v. City of Rome

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1936No. 25208PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

A municipal corporation “is bound to use ordinary care to keep its public streets and sidewalks which are open for public use in a reasonably safe condition for passage.” Herrington v. Macon, 125 Ga. 58, 61 (54 S. E. 71). For a failure to exercise this care, it will be liable for resulting injuries, “no matter by what cause the street or sidewalk may have become defective or unsafe, where the city knew or should have known of the defect in time to repair it or to give warning of its existence.” McFarland v. McCaysville, 39 Ga. App. 739 (148 S. E. 421). The question here presented is not one…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scott v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. City of Brunswick v. GlogauerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. McFarland v. City of McCaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Dempsey v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Rogers v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Barnesville v. SappingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Mason v. CroweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. City of Albany v. HumberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. McKay v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Yancey v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API