Legal Opinion
Smith v. S&S Dundalk Engineering Works, Ltd.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 16, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-2660(WHW)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Walls, District Judge.
Defendant Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC (“Royal & Sun UK”) moves to dismiss the complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction, or in the alternative to dismiss due to forum non conveniens. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 78, this matter is decided without oral argument. The motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted, and the motion to dismiss due to forum non conveniens is denied as moot.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Donald Smith (“Smith”) and Eleanor Smith (collectively, “plaintiffs”) filed this action which seeks a…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Display Works, LLC v. BartleyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Mylan Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Barron v. VanierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Leja v. Schmidt Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Dutch Run-Mays Draft, LLC v. Wolf Block, LLPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.