Brown v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138¼ et seq.). The legality of an arrest and seizure without warrant is the only question presented for our consideration.
The defendant in error contends that the question is not properly before us, because there was no objection to the testimony when offered, no motion to suppress, and no application for a return of the property seized, before trial. The case was tried in the court below without a jury, with little or no formality; but we think…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Contee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Poldo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Wisniewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.