Legal Opinion

Wright, P. v. Misty Mountain Farm, LLC

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 2015No. 1658 MDA 2014PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JENKINS, J.:

Patricia Wright appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Misty Mountain Farm, LLC, Shirley Matthews, and Dean Buck (“the Misty Mountain parties”). Wright argues that she owns subsurface oil, gas and mineral rights as the successor in interest to the grantees under a deed dated November 24, 1950. The trial court held that the Misty Mountain parties, the successors in interest to the grantors under the deed, own the sub surface rights. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On November 24, 1950, the grantors, Fred and Jeanetta Buck, husband and wife,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. MacKall v. FleegleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Petrina v. Allied Glove Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Lauderbach-Zerby Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Morgan ex rel. Mumma v. Petroleum Products Equipment Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Ralston v. RalstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Prop.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Johnson, L. v. Toll BrothersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Nigon, L. v. Jewell, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Harrington, S. v. Jeffers Farms, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Grove, J. v. Lutz, P.&L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API