Legal Opinion

Peirce v. Jones

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1900No. 3,003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Prom the Tipton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, C. J.

Appellee’s wife was injured while crossing the tracks of the Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad, where it intersects a certain street in the city of Kokomo. The complaint is in two paragraphs, and alleges that the injury was occasioned by the negligence and carelessness of appellant while operating a train upon said railroad. It is not necessary for us to state the acts of negligence charged, for no question is raised as to the sufficiency of the complaint upon that ground. The only part of the complaint referring to or defining the official capacity of appellant, Peirce, is as follows:…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keen v. BreckenridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Gainey v. GilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wayne Pike Co. v. State ex rel. WhitakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Davis v. Ladoga Creamery Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hatfield v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sacks v. American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Harmon v. PerkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API