Legal Opinion
Sikand v. Wilson-Coker
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 17, 2006No. SC 17244PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Rani Sikand, is entitled to non-emergency medical transportation services to and from her psychologist’s office under the state’s medicaid program. LogistiCare, Inc. (LogistiCare), the medical transportation broker for the department of social services (department), had provided transportation services between the plaintiffs home and her psychologist’s office. In April, 2003, LogistiCare terminated the transportation services, claiming that they were no longer covered following certain amendments to the medicaid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Weaver v. ReagenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Himes v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Ghent v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Wyatt Energy, Inc. v. Motiva Enterprises, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Pasquariello v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Colangelo v. HeckelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Ricigliano v. Ideal Forging Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Jarvis v. LiederConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.