Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Higgins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1932No. 22247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “All writs of certiorari shall be applied for within thirty days after the final determination of the case in which the error is alleged to have been committed, and not after.” Civil Code (1910), § 5188. “It is proper to dismiss a certiorari where it does not affirmatively appear from the record that the writ was applied for within thirty days after the final determination of the case.” Landrum v. Moss, 1 Ga. App. 216 (1) (57 S. E. 965); Sirmans v. Zucker Importing Co., 9 Ga. App. 789 (2) (72 S. E. 190).

2. “Where the order of the judge of the superior court, dismissing a petition for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Memmler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Landrum v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Kendricks v. City of MillenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Sirmans, Morris & Co. v. Zucker Importing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. West Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Goldstein v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Zachry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Cohn v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Gilbert v. Land Estates Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API