Legal Opinion

Austin v. Hines

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 51PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Appellants brought this action against the director general of railroads to recover damages for the death of their minor child. The right to sue appellee was denied by the court below; hence this appeal. The circumstances leading to the death of the child as establishing negligence in some one is not disputed; appellants urge the director general is the one so liable.

At the beginning of the war, the Pittsburgh^ Fort Wayne & Chicago Railroad, an operating carrier, was located, at one point, on Fifth Avenue, New Brighton. Then, and for a long time prior thereto,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Nash v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1919
  4. Schumacher v. Pennsylvania RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  5. United States Railroad Administration v. BurchDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Park v. HinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API