Sizemore v. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1DissentMcCRAW, Justice
I respectfully dissent. The majority has misapplied the proper standard of review to be used by the court hearing an appeal from the revocation of a professional license. After a review of the statement of facts and application of the appellate review standard, I must conclude that the rulings of the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners and the 95th District Court should be affirmed.
*399The Examining Board reached three conclusions in support of their order revoking Sizemore’s license: (1) Sizemore prescribed controlled substances that were not necessary or required in the practice of dentistry…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Imperial American Resources Fund, Inc. v. Railroad Commission of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Dotson v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Thompson v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Korndorffer v. Texas State Bd. of Medical ExaminersTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Korndorffer v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.