Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sizemore v. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 28, 1987No. 05-86-00189-CVPublished

1DissentMcCRAW, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority has misapplied the proper standard of review to be used by the court hearing an appeal from the revocation of a professional license. After a review of the statement of facts and application of the appellate review standard, I must conclude that the rulings of the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners and the 95th District Court should be affirmed.

*399The Examining Board reached three conclusions in support of their order revoking Sizemore’s license: (1) Sizemore prescribed controlled substances that were not necessary or required in the practice of dentistry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Imperial American Resources Fund, Inc. v. Railroad Commission of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dotson v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Thompson v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Korndorffer v. Texas State Bd. of Medical ExaminersTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Korndorffer v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API