Legal Opinion
Connors v. Paybra Mining Co.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided December 1, 1992No. Civ. A. 2:90-1061PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are the parties cross motions for summary judgment. The Court partially GRANTS the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and DENIES the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The case will proceed to trial to resolve the remaining issues of material fact.
Under Rule 56(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is proper only:
“[I]f the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 v. Centra, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Abbey E. Blatt v. Marshall and Lassman (Formerly Known as Marshall, Lassman and Company), a Partnership, Louis v. Marshall and Joseph I. LassmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lopresti v. TerwilligerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Bannistor v. UllmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- ITPE Pension Fund v. Roger HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Fahey v. FaheyBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2012
- Eavenson v. RameyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.