Legal Opinion

Riordan v. Zube

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1920No. Civ. No. 3475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County setting aside a default and sustaining demurrers without leave to amend. Dana R. Weller and L. H. Valentine, Judges. Appeal dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Plaintiff and appellant commenced an action in the superior court to set aside a judgment of the justice’s court and to restrain its enforcement. He named as defendants the justice of the peace who had tried the case in the justice’s court and the plaintiff in that action. Their demurrers to plaintiff’s complaint were sustained. Plaintiff was given ten days to amend and the defendants were given five days thereafter to plead to the amended complaint. Within due time plaintiff filed his amended complaint. The defendants failed to plead within the five days allowed, and upon application of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ewing v. Richvale Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Pfeiffer v. McGarveyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Gonzalez v. California Highway PatrolDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Treefrog Developments, Inc. v. Nu-X Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API