Legal Opinion
Foster v. Wicklund
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1989No. 88-279PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Justice.
A real estate development plan controversy intermixing residential and commer cial usage created this litigation between the estate of the developer and the purchaser of residential homesite lots. Issues of proper party and mootness are presented for review in this factually simple, although litigatively complex proceeding.
Appellants assess their issues as whether:
I. * * * the Estate of Mayme I. Lestum [developer] was a proper party to this action?
II. * * * Mayme I. Lestum breached her contract with the appellants [home-site occupants]?
Restated, appellee Loraine Wicklund…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Belondon v. STATE, LEIMBACKWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Northern Utilities, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McLain v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Vigil v. RuettgersWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Wyoming Coalition v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Mari v. Rawlins National Bank of RawlinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Anne Holding and Crandall Creek Ranch, Co., a Wyoming corporation v. Larry Luckinbill the Larry Lee Luckinbill Living Trust John Lennon and Melanie LennonWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.