Legal Opinion
Hilliard v. Marshall
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided August 10, 1999No. Civ.A.96-0368PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
LITTLE, Chief Judge.
Before this court is defendant The Nei-man Marcus Group’s (“Neiman Marcus”) motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is DENIED.
I. Background
This litigation arises out of a living trust created by the late J. Howard Marshall II (“Mr. Marshall”) on 1 September 1982. Mr. Marshall’s death generated numerous lawsuits. Finley Hilliard, as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall II Living Trust (“Trust” 1 ), and E. Pierce Marshall, individually and as trustee of the Marshall Museum and Library, 2 filed the instant suit, seeking a declaratory…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- S.E.C. v. RecileCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Sarpy v. SarpyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. State Dept. of Health & HospitalsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005