Legal Opinion

Brodsky v. New York City Campaign Finance Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered July 16, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, in a turnover proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5225 (b), directed the sale of *545stock held by petitioner judgment debtor Meryl Brodsky, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The turnover proceedings at issue on this appeal arise from an audit completed by respondent New York City Campaign Finance Board determining that petitioners were required to return $35,415 following the 2005 primary election. Petitioner Meryl Brodsky was a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Feliz v. FragosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. New York City Campaign Finance Board v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Brodsky v. New York City Campaign Finance BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API