Legal Opinion
Nyland v. Brock
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 1997No. 95CA0847PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TAUBMAN.
Defendants, Vernalee Brock and the Regional Transportation District (collectively RTD), bring this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s determination that the action brought by plaintiff, Travis Nyland, was not barred on the basis of governmental immunity. We affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. In March 1993, while crossing the intersection on foot, plaintiff was injured when he was struck by an RTD bus driven by Brock. Thereafter, plaintiff initiated this action seeking compensation for the injuries he suffered. RTD moved to dismiss the complaint on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Regional Transportation District v. LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- East Lakewood Sanitation District v. District Court in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Carpa v. TuckerColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brock v. NylandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Curlin v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bresciani v. HaraganColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Bresciani v. HaraganColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Brock v. NylandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.