Legal Opinion
Brock v. Nyland
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 13, 1998No. 96SC582PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
In this case, we must decide whether the filing of notice with the claims department of the Regional Transportation District (RTD) satisfies the statutory requirement that “notice shall be filed with the governing body of the public entity or the attorney representing the public entity” as set forth in section 24-10-109(3), 7 C.R.S. (1997). Relying on the plain language of the statute, we conclude that it does not.
Our order granting certiorari in Nyland v. Brock, 937 P.2d 806 (Colo.App.1996) set forth several issues and requires that we decide “[wjhether the court of appeals erred in holding…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Regional Transportation District v. LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Regional Transportation District v. VossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Dawson v. ReiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Hall v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Finnie v. Jefferson County School District R-1Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Mesa County Valley School District No. 51 v. KelseySupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.