Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ransom v. Radiology Specialists of the Nw.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2018No. CC 15CV08484 (SC S064309)Published

1DissentNakamoto, J.

This mandamus proceeding concerns the application of Oregon's widely recognized bar on expert discovery to doctors who were actors in events relevant to plaintiff's medical malpractice action. Plaintiff's position is that the bar on expert discovery applies solely to a party's retained experts. Unsurprisingly, this court revisits a decision it issued a decade ago in Gwin v. Lynn , 344 Or. 65, 176 P.3d 1249 (2008), which also involved the deposition of an expert who was an actor in events relevant to that civil action. Despite **578Gwin , a majority of the court now concludes that the doctors…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Tiedemann v. Radiation Therapy ConsultantsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gwin v. LynnOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Ransom v. Radiology Specialists of the Nw.Oregon Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API