Legal Opinion

Rice v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 29, 1995No. CR-95-0097PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner, James Paul Rice, appeals from the trial court's denial of his fourth Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition. It appears that the petitioner's allegations may have merit.See, Hall v. State, 655 So.2d 51 (Ala.Crim.App. 1995).

The petitioner was originally indicted for rape in the first degree and for incest. The petitioner was allowed to plead guilty to attempted second degree rape. He now cites Hall,supra, for support for his contention that his plea was illegal. The Hall court stated, "An indictment cannot be amended to charge an offense that was not encompassed in the original…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Ex Parte FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Kolmetz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. Ligon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API